Hi *, 

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:25:39AM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
 
> I'm seeing this, too (it's not an isolated report), but my fix was (very)
> slightly different:
> 
> sincerity-forever:/usr/lib# ln -s libldap.so.2.0.130 libldap.so.2

Well, with all this fuss about that symbolic link to libldap_r I'd
say it is by far easier to make the libldap library a copy of libldap_r.

@Steve: What do you think? It will cost a bit of disk space (if we don't
hardlink which is evil as well) but will probably kill those problems.
It's a difference of 220kByte. 

Greetings

        Torsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to