Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Laurence, > * Laurence J. Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-01 04:00]: >> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> as the maintainer of imlib2 is MIA I'm going to upload a >>> 0-day NMU. >> Thanks for the NMU, but the 12 hour stretch from your initial report >> until the NMU is quite far from stating someone is MIA. > [private: snipped] > > Thats not far from stating you are MIA. Contact the MIA team to update this > then.
Hmm, it is *far* from stating that he is MIA. As you can see there is only a nice message sent twice which means it's only the very first stage which only means some people were concerned... There are at least 2 extra stages (inactive, unresponsive), normally even 3 (prod before inactive) before someone is declared MIA... This is all explained in the README file, though if you don't want to look into the details it's probably better to ask the MIA Team before jumping to conclusions. You could also see that the information you are referring to is from 2006 and no action has been done on 2007 which means there was no real concern in 2007 anymore. Cheers Luk PS: The MIA information is supposed to be private and shouldn't be copied to this bug report... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
