On 03/07/06 at 16:18 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Package: developers-reference
> Version: 3.3.7
> Severity: normal
>
> |* Downgrade the package to the previous version (if one exists) ---
> |this tests the `postrm' and `prerm' scripts.
>
> Although downgrading *might* be actively supported by some packages,
> this seems to imply that it must be supported, which encourages people
> to think that they're allowed to downgrade stuff.
Agreed, I think that this line could be removed.
> Also, it seems misleading in its suggestion about the
> {post,pre}removal maintscripts, which are also exercised during any
> upgrade (though different paths are not, and it takes pretty
> deliberate effort to test eg. the abort-* and failed-* paths).
>
> A better recipe for testing (copied from a message to my AM):
>
> . put package into "old version installed" state, perhaps by purging
> whatever's installed, and apt-get installing some version from the
> archive (probably shouldn't be older than the most recent stable
> release).
>
> . dpkg -i foo.deb
>
> . check that the upgrade happend as intended; this might include
> things like: conffile updates, /usr/doc transition stuff,
> symlink/dir conversion stuff, etc. Basically ensuring that the
> maintscripts do what's intended. The package should of course be
> usable :)
>
> . dpkg -r foo
>
> . again make sure the maintscripts do what's intended. Make sure
> that eg. info documents and alternatives are unregistered.
>
> . dpkg -P foo
>
> . make sure that any generated files (eg. in /var/{lib,cache} and
> /etc/) are removed. This also includes debconf cache and anything
> similar eg. update-rc.d removal.
>
> . dpkg -i foo.deb
>
> . Check more maintscript actions; the package should be usuable
>
> . dpkg -i foo.deb
>
> . The package should still be usable :) This should probably just
> check for idempotency at some level; eg. that installation doesn't
> depend on some file that is only created in preinst.
It sounds too long to include in devref as-is. Could you maybe shorten
it a bit and provide a patch against section 5.3?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
