On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:55:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:41:15PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > > Don't worry too much yet, it still could be a just a portability issue. > > > > > Probably not. That could be a window manager related issue, though. Can > > > you try with another one ? > > > > normally using kwin. Fired a Xephyr at :2 and tried with icewm and > > metacity - same results :( > > ... but it does work with a very very simple xul application. If it > weren't, it wouldn't build: there is a test rule that would prevent the > build to go further...
It was a hello world xulapp.zip I found somewhere I'm trying atm. I've now put the build-logs here: http://nchipin.kos.to/xulrunner/ > Did you try mybrowser or xulmine ? > http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/xulrunner/ > (unzip and run xulrunner-1.9 application.ini) Same results with both of them :| I had to edit application.ini to allow version 1.9 of xulrunner. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
