On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 07:37:22AM +0200, Danny ter Haar wrote: > Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Can you tell us what version of mdadm you had installed prior to this?
> I just upgraded my machine and this happened: > Preparing to replace mdadm 1.9.0-2.3 (using .../mdadm_1.9.0-3_i386.deb) ... > Stopping RAID monitor daemon: mdadm -F. > Unpacking replacement mdadm ... > [SNIP] > Setting up mdadm (1.9.0-3) ... > Starting raid devices: mdadm: failed to add /dev/sdb to /dev/md0: Device or > resource busy > mdadm: failed to add /dev/sda to /dev/md0: Device or resource busy > mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 0 drives - not enough to start the array. > done. > Starting RAID monitor daemon: mdadm -F. Right, so, the RAID arrays were not started on upgrade because they were already running. I don't see any bugs here. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
