On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:02:38PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Philipp Hartmann wrote: > >The recent NMU of Samuel (see #309089) to link GKrellM against GNUTLS > >introduced a bug (#310471), for which I already filed a patch. > > > >Since the GKrellM package version 2.2.5-1.2 is now hinted into Sarge, I > >would like to know how this should be handled. > > > >The crashes will render the package unusable for all user that check > >more than one SSL enabled mailbox with GKrellM. I think, there are many > >of them out there, including me ;-) > > > >So IMHO, the version 2.2.5-1.2 should definitely NOT go into the > >release. But I don't feel authorised to raise the severity of bug > >#310471, since the package is not completely unusable. > > > >Due to the hint, the package goes to testing tomorrow. > >Therefore, I send you this mail. > > > >What do you think?
> Thanks for noticing and fixing this so fast (I made some tests but I did > not think of thread-safeness issues...). I also think that it should be > corrected before entering sarge (though strictly speaking I also don't > think it's a RC bug). > I can have an NMU ready with your updated patch quite soon. > Debian-release, what do you think? Should I upload it as soon as > possible (i.e. before it enters sarge)? I'll do so in a few hours unless > someone objects to it in the meantime. gkrellm 2.2.5-1.3 approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
