Hello Daniel, On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:12:04AM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the pymol package: > > #231844: pymol: Small Error on startup > > It has been closed by Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> by > replying to this email. > > > -- > 231844: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=231844 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> (2006-07-26) on rietz.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
> autolearn=no version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> Subject: pymol: Small Error on startup
> From: Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'm going to close your report. It has been filed 4 years ago against a
> version, that is not longer available in Debian. Requests to provide
> check for the existence of this issue in current packages have not been
> answered. So I assume, you cannot reproduce the problem either and I'll
> close the report.
Please remain honest when closing bugs. There has been *no* request to
reproduce. You probably refer to #12 in the bug log? Besides being the
first reaction after almost 4 years it was *not* CC: to me (the BTS
does not send mails automatically to the submitter), so I was not
informed nor asked. I am usually rather responsive *if* I'm asked, and
I gladly provide more input if possible, but for it to help, you
should care about it in a more timely (and bug reporter friendly)
fashion.
Btw., the proper way would have been to tag this bug "unreproducible"
if you cannot reproduce it (I assume you tried?).
> Please feel free to comment on this decision or reopen your report if
> necessary.
I just checked on my Etch/amd64 box and the bug is not reproducible,
but I don't have an alpha anymore where I could check.
But since I don't care much for pymol (at that time I was asked by
Andreas Tille to try science related programms on alpha an report,
something which you seem to be not interested in) and I cannot
reproduce the bug on amd64 I won't reopen this bug.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
