On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 07:39:17PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
> It seems more likely to me that the Received header is somehow being
> suppressed (it should be inserted by the host that's running spfmilter,
> right?)

No. It is removing the most recent Received header which is _already_ in
the received message (i.e. the header added by the MTA which directly
preceded the problematic one on the message's path).

> I still don't understand how spfmilter could be causing this, so I plan
> to take it to postfix-users or similar. Based on the spfmilter package
> version, I'm guessing you're running etch, and therefore Postfix 2.3.8;
> can you confirm that?

My guess would be that the API does not work like spfmilter assumes it
does. I don't know where the bug lies, though.

Yes, I am using etch, postfix 2.3.8-2

-- 
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>             http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216  FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75  D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to