On 4/30/08, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sergei Golovan wrote: > > > I think that it's easier to me to adopt c2man than to switch to another > tool. > > > > In the short term, yes. However, that means leaving c2man in the archive > just for the manpages you generate with it. This has two drawbacks, namely > you have the burden of maintaining it (might be small) and users might try > to use it and fail (might be a greater problem). > Naturally, it's your decision, but I am tempted to think that in the long > run it might be better to change the way you generate documentation.
It's true, but it's not me who decided to generate manpages using c2man. It's upstream decision and I don't think that I'll easily convince the author to rewrite it. Though I'll try to. -- Sergei Golovan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
