On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:10:24AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:54:51PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:53:00PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> I'd be _very_ happy if you could make the 1.9 branch available in > >> unstable. But even in experimental it will get compiled for the > >> popular architectures so is of some use for testing out this core > >> Sugar activity. > > > >This won't happen before all rdeps of the current xulrunner in unstable > >are ready for the transition. I hope this can happen before the end of > >May. > > Do I understand you correctly that your aim is only to _replace_ 1.8 > with 1.9? Isn't it possible to have them side by side (with clashing 1.9 > package names renamed to -unstable or similar)?
Yes and No. I don't want to have to maintain 2 xulrunners in the stable release. So there will only be 1.9 (well, 1.8 will stay with iceape and icedove, but not in a xulrunner form). But the older packages will still be installable in parallel. You already can install xulrunner from unstable and experimental at the same time, thought they come from the same source package name. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
