On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Luka Renko wrote: > COPYING-DOCS specifies that license is GFDL 1.2, while debian/copyright > claims that license is GFDL 1.1.
Luka, Marco, Thanks for the report. I have gotten around to this and updated debian/copyright to match help:/digikam/index.html which is actually GFDL1.1 or later. So while the upstream tarball ships with COPYING-DOCS the actual licence is per the text. I have also updated to reflect /usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL. I will upload the 0.9.3 package and then the 0.9.4-beta doc packages separately to Debian unstable/ experimental. Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
