Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Right, that makes sense. Maybe I just got confused by this patch > then, but I suppose a brief note that http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ is > supported wouldn't hurt. But if you don't want to mention it, just > close this bug report.
I'll take a patch, but since I cannot find a place in the documentation that seems like a good place to mention it, I'll close the bug if I don't get a patch. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
