On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:26:11PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Apr 20 2008, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:02 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Any news about this?
> > > 
> > > If I don't hear any reply within a week I'll NMU.
> > 
> > I don't see anything wrong with including this.
> > 
> > Rogerio, any opinion?
> 
> I postponed this decision of integrating the patch because I wanted to
> have something that were able to:
> 
> * list contrib packages only;
> * list non-free packages only;
> * list contrib packages together with non-free.
> 
> This is due to the very nature of contrib packages, which are Free and,
> so, the person wishing to see how his/her system is configured should be
> able to sort out the degrees of freedom in his/her system.

In theory, contrib packages are just free packages which due to some
unfortunate circumstances have a dependency on non-free (which hopefuly can
be removed in the future).  "dosemu" would be a good, long-standing
example.

In practice, most of the top popular contrib packages are not like that.  The
following are just installers for non-free content:

1     msttcorefonts                  12820   324  4371   423  7702 (Thijs 
Kinkhorst)               
2     flashplugin-nonfree             8319  1807  1528   580  4404 (Bart 
Martens)                  
4     java-package                    3800   471  2227  1100     2 (Debian Java 
Maintainers)       
8     googleearth-package             2146   316  1368   462     0 (Wesley J. 
Landaker)            
24    vmware-package                   651   116   237   298     0 (Debian 
Vmware-package Team)    

and then you have others which by design cannot be conceived as something that
is useful at all without something non-free attached to them:

7     nspluginwrapper                 2636  1051  1248   335     2 (Rob 
Andrews)                   
10    avifile-win32-plugin            1768    28   300    23  1417 (Zdenek 
Kabelac)                

I think any ethical or legal concerns one could have with running non-free
apply the same way to them.

So, may I suggest that contrib is just listed unconditionally?

-- 
Robert Millan

"The technological evasion of the license is as unacceptable as the
 legal evasion of the license [...].  That's the provision in section
 1 regarding keys. [...]  We say one thing: when you sell somebody a
 home... give him the keys"  -- Eben Moglen on GPLv3



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to