On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 07:54:55AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > usertag 472578 + intend-to-nmu > > thanks > > > > hey, > > As this bug has been open with a patch for about a month and has no > > rejection from the maintainer, I intend to NMU the associated package > > in a week's time (or sooner, if requested by the maintainer). > > > > If you do not wish for this NMU to occur, please send a follow-up in > > the bug report stating as such or, better yet, fix it in an MU :) > > > I think you can safely go for it. I NMU'ed that package some weeks > ago, for l10n stuff, without any news from the maintainer. > > So, either he's MIA, or he's OK for low threshold NMUs...
Thanks Christian, advice taken. Patch attached. -- dann frazier
diff -u gnarwl-3.3/debian/changelog gnarwl-3.3/debian/changelog --- gnarwl-3.3/debian/changelog +++ gnarwl-3.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +gnarwl (3.3-8.5) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Define LDAP_DEPRECATED in order to continue using + deprecated prototypes. Closes: #472568 + + -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:29:55 -0600 + gnarwl (3.3-8.4) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload to fix pending l10n issues. only in patch2: unchanged: --- gnarwl-3.3.orig/src/dbaccess.c +++ gnarwl-3.3/src/dbaccess.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> +#define LDAP_DEPRECATED 1 #include <ldap.h> #include <lber.h>
