Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > FWIW, I think adding a libthread_db-specific patch to mklibs > (Joseph's part 4) is reasonable. It's part of glibc, for which there > are already local hacks in mklibs. And it's a library with a > particularly annoying interface, that relies on undefined symbols in > the library being defined in the application. > > Any thoughts on applying the patch?
With that clarification, I see no problem, applied. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
