Tobias Frost wrote:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 10:24 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
No, it's not an endian problem. i386, amd64, arm, and armel are _all_
little-endian.
MMmmh, I always thought arm and armel differs in endianess...
Nope, some packing, and syscall, and FP differences. If you have a
sid/armel install, or an etch/arm install you can install a sid/arm
chroot under it (using debootstrap), and test that if you suspect armel
vs arm....
Ta,
Tim.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
