On 17 Apr 2008, at 8:02 pm, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
I gave it a try with acedb
Wow - that's beyond the call of duty. :-) "Interesting" user
interface, n'est ce pas? Quirky, but actually damned good at what it
does once you're used to it.
and the behaviour seems to be the same on
etch and sid. If I run two processes of xace, each with several
windows
open, they are all grouped togheter.
Right, that's what we see.
Just to make sure I don't misunderstand anything; You would prefer
it if
there were two groups, one for each xace process? Alternatively, it
would be better if the group didn't sort the names alphabetically,
instead making it clear which windows belonged to which process?
Either of those solutions would be acceptable to my user I think. The
first one is what the documentation appears to say it's supposed to
do. I realise that this could be hard to do, because it would
probably do nasty things to e.g. terminal windows, depending on
whether the terminal window was opened by starting a fresh copy of
terminal, or using Ctrl+Shift+N. The second one is probably easier to
do without incurring nasty behaviour for other applications. I
suppose it could always be an additional configuration option...
Tim
--
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research
Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a
company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered
office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
