libspf is currently orphaned in Debian and upstream is currently missing, so I think it's fair game for any reasonable interpretation of what doing the right thing is.
I've done a few things to get libspf back into Testing, but am really not up for maintaining the package, so I'd say go ahead and do what you think is right. I am a pyspf maintainer upstream and the Debian maintainer for the package. It used to use a recursion limit too and so I have some experience with this is a similar library and some opinions on what it should do.... I think the behavior described in #464029 is definitely wrong. I think is the recursion limit is reached, some kind of error should definitely be reached. I think it's open to debate if libspf or spfmilter should be resetting the recursion level. I think it's likely harmless if it's it's done in libspf (worst case it gets reset twice), so I think your idea is in the right direction, but should also raise and error (return unknown for a result). Note: I don't code C, so I've no opinion on the implementation in the patch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
