On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:58:12PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 08:30 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:40:29AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Package: xulrunner-dev-static > > > Version: 1.9~b4-1 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > The library flags in libxul.pc and libxul-unstable.pc are: > > > > > > - -L/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9/lib -lxpcomglue_s -lxul -lxpcom > > > > > > libxul.so and libxpcom.so are installed in /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9 so > > > these flags will result in executables that cannot be loaded unless > > > that directory is added to the library search using the -rpath linker > > > option or LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > > > > I think it's not the .pc file role to enforce the use or rpath or > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > <snip> > > It's supposed to specify the linker flags you need to get a working > executable. Now mozilla-dev and libxul-dev never did this either, but > it's about time this was fixed.
It is prefered to use the -embedding.pc files anyway. I don't want to help people linking against libxul and libxpcom. They have to willfully do it. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
