Ryan,
On 13 May 2005 at 11:33, Ryan Lovett wrote:
| Package: r-base
| Version: 2.1.0-1
| Severity: normal
|
| > plot(1:10)
| Error in X11() : could not find any X11 fonts
| Check that the Font Path is correct.
|
|
| If LANG= , the above command works fine. In r-base-core/changelog.gz, I
| read:
|
| INTERNATIONALIZATION
|
| o Unix-alike versions of R can now be used in UTF-8 and other
| multi-byte locales on suitably equipped OSes if configured
| with option --enable-mbcs (which is the default). [The
| changes to font handling in the X11 module are based on the
| Japanization patches of Eiji Nakama.]
|
| so I build debs with this option explicitly enabled, but it made no
| difference.
Did you find anything out when talking to the amd64 folks? I am CCing this
to Peter who is very knowledgeable about amd64 as well -- Peter, the amd64
package should be built with exactly the same parameters as the other ten or
eleven arches, in particular as the 64 bit hppa and ia64.
Any idea what may go astray here? Is there a relation to the r-bugs post of
png() failing under amd64 ?
Regards, Dirk
|
| -- System Information:
| Debian Release: 3.1
| Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
| Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp
| Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
|
| Versions of packages r-base depends on:
| ii r-base-core 2.1.0-1 GNU R core of statistical
computin
| ii r-recommended 2.1.0-1 GNU R collection of recommended
pa
|
| -- no debconf information
--
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
-- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
