Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might need to explain us in more details what is a "kexec'able" kernel.
I think I would write either kexec-enabled or kexec-ready, depending on whether it is the kernel that can kexec, or the kernel to be loaded by kexec, respectively. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]