Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might need to explain us in more details what is a "kexec'able" kernel.

I think I would write either kexec-enabled or kexec-ready, depending
on whether it is the kernel that can kexec, or the kernel to be loaded
by kexec, respectively.

Hope that helps,
-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to