Le vendredi, 22 février 2008 19.00:08 Todd C. Miller, vous avez écrit : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > so spake Justin Pryzby (justinpryzby): > > # http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462445 > > forwarded 462445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > retitle 462445 sudo can segfault with valid pam configuration > > That's a legitimate sudo bug. It will be fixed in the next sudo > release. > > > # http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306919 > > forwarded 306919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > retitle 306919 sudo -k with tty_tickets set doesn't revoke all/any of > > the t imestamps > > It wasn't really my intent to remove all timestamps via -k/-K when > tty_tickets are enabled. I can see how that might be useful, though > I worry that there may be people relying on the current behavior. > I'll have to think about it some more. > > Thanks for bringing these to my attention. > > - todd
Hi ! I have a bug that I think is similar to that one. While using libpam-fprint with this in /etc/pam.d/common-auth auth sufficient pam_fprint.so auth required pam_unix.so nullok_secure This is what I get : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo -k [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo echo "1" Scan right index finger on UPEK TouchStrip 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo echo "1" Erreur de segmentation So sudo segfaults. In my opinion, this is almost important severity. Is this the same bug or should I report it a new time ? Regards, Didier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
