Severity 470359 serious thanks g77 has gone from unstable, so cgal is now unbuildable. cgal is also the last package build-depending on atlas3, thus blocking it's removal from archive.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:38:35PM +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > >Currently build-deps read: > > > >Build-Depends: atlas3-base-dev [!arm !armeb !armel !m68k] | > >libatlas-3.so [!arm !armeb !armel !m68k], > >lapack3-dev [!arm !armeb !armel !m68k], ... > > > >You probably want just > > > >Build-Depends: liblapack-dev > > > >To transition to the gfortran compiled version of lapack/blas/atlas. > >It will automatically pull atlas on supported archictures, else it > >will use lapack. > > where can I find more information about the gfortran transition and about > its implication for package maintainers? Is there no one-to-one translation > for the currently used package names? On what packages should cgal depend > if I want to keep an explicit dependency on atlas *and* lapack. > > My package has optional support for atlas *and* lapack. For maximum > flexibility of the library users I would like to enable support for both. > Thus I explicitly depend on both (e.g., linking with -llapack will not work > if just atlas is installed). > > Is there some information about the contracts/requirements for the involved > virtual packages? I contacted Camm Mcguire about this, but didn't receive > an answer. > > Joachim -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
