On 19-May-2005, Clint Adams wrote: > > Since 0.93.3, bogofilter has been able to use SQLite (>= 3.0.8) for > > its database storage. Some problems were fixed in 0.94.2, and now > > require SQLite (>= 3.2.0). > > For what benefit? Why not tdb or qdbm?
Ah, now I see what your "For what benefit?" is referring to. You placed it under a statement of "bogofilter can now use sqlite", so I thought you were asking me the benefit of that (which I thought was a strange thing to ask). Instead, I think you're asking me "for what benefit is a sqlite-enabled build of bogofilter in Debian?" In answer to that question, my answer is much the same: bogofilter is capable of providing that alternative, and I'd like to be able to take advantage of it in a Debian binary package. If other backend storage is possible, there's even more reason to have alternative builds of Debian: to use the capabilities provided by the upstream software. -- \ "Pity the meek, for they shall inherit the earth." -- Donald | `\ Robert Perry Marquis | _o__) | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
