> It shouldn't matter what kernel you're running. It should only matter > what kernel source tree you ran make-kpkg from inside. You need to run > make-kpkg from inside a kernel source tree that's identically configured > to the kernel that you're running. This makes sense, and it is the case...
> In other words, if you're building your own kernel with make-kpkg, you > should install openafs-modules-source and untar it before starting, and > then run make-kpkg kernel_image modules_image to build both the kernel and > the module .deb at the same time out of the same source tree. I only do make-kpkg modules_image, the kernel itself is build by usual steps (make dep; make bzImage; make modules; make modules_install). > Could you send more details on exactly what commands you're running and > what source trees you're using for both the kernel and make-kpkg? I'm > still trying to wrap my head around what would cause building the module > out of the unpacked source tree outside of make-kpkg to work and building > it with make-kpkg to fail. That sounds very much like a mismatch of > kernel source trees, but I'm not sure. I have discussed possibility of remote access (ssh) for you to the server and it is agreed that you can do it. If you are interested, I can e-mail you the IP and the password. There is nothing important on the server at the moment. The kernel source is 2.4.30 from kernel.org. The make-kpkg looks version 1.94 (make-kpkg --help). Regards Vladimir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
