-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 16-05-2005 22:06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:03:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> * libgd-noxpm-perl (built from exact same source) is in sarge. > > > Eh, why aren't both packages actually built from the same source package > then? If they are two variants of the same package, they should be built > from the same source.
Because build-dependencies are not equal. > Since both packages are obsolete though, I don't think it's worth fixing > this now. Fwiw, I couldn't find any reverse depends on either of those > packages, not even in unstable, so why have these two packages in sarge > anyway? How did you check? A quick look using aptitude interactively seems to show that the following packages depend, require or suggest libgd-perl: ipac-ng diablo libtemplate-perl remstats - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nÃr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCil/3n7DbMsAkQLgRAmrtAJsGv8ypfUx/YTl8qq06Qz83oCupGgCdEVNn KiFeffaYUjarjEpOWtb5V+M= =uvZ0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
