On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:18:15PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Hi Marcin! > > On Wed, 04 May 2005, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:34:12PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > you are right, keepalived doesn't work with the debian default kernel. > > > The ipvs code used in the default kernel is buggy, so keepalived is build > > > against the ipvs headers from 2.6.11/2.4.28. > > > > Could you provide more details on how it is buggy? I think that this > > should also be reported against kernel-source-2.4.27 > Of course: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=4855643&forum_id=3211 > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5353482&forum_id=3211
Thanks. Is the problem with VRRP syncd the only serious one? I'm asking because I need to decide whether to upgrade to 2.6, or stay with 2.4 (I'm only using one director so far, so I don't care about VRRP). Marcin -- Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
