On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Ian Jackson wrote: > Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#71621: Policy on update-alternatives still > needed"): > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:25:56PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > * retain the manual configuration but simply not use it when > > > then user's manual selection is unavailable. > > > > That sounds more promising to me. > > If we do this and retain the existing maintainer scripts then > everything will be fine *except* that while (say) nvi is unpacked but > not configured, the system will mysteriously use vim (say) instead.
It's still way better than having no editor. > Perhaps more thought is actually needed. I really don't like the idea > of asking maintainers to switch on $1. That always goes wrong. But > we could ask them to pass their $1 to u-a ? debhelper postinst snippets tend to check $1 for most operation, I don't see a big problem in mandating their usage. Another solution is to define the alternatives in some debhelper configuration file (debian/package.alternatives) and let debhelper create the right postrm/postint snippet. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/