On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 18:44 +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Diab Jerius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Diab, > > > I took a different approach. I first verified that the scanner wasn't > > itself broken by hunting up an old hard drive with W98 on it and running > > that. It worked fine, so that's out of the way. > > > > Then I downloaded a demo of vuescan for linux from www.hamrick.com. It > > worked, perfectly, with libusb at 0.1.10a-9. So, unless sane is > > tweaking libusb a lot differently from vuescan, this strongly implies > > the problem is not libusb. > > Could you read the last few mails of the bug log and try to run a > newer kernel ? If it still fails, then we're positive there's a > problem. > > JB. >
Julien, I did that a couple of days ago, but I seem to have forgotten to mention that; sorry! kernel-image 2.6.11-1-k7 libusb-0.1-4 0.1.10a-9 libsane 1.0.15-9 It still fails. Diab -- Diab Jerius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
