Hello Guus, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:09:24AM +0100, Steve Wolter wrote: > > [...] > > In contrast to the libhnj implementation, this one isn't broken. > > I think you should remove this line from the package description.
Thank you for the feedback. I added this line to make sure that this package is found when an user searches for libhnj, which omitted cru- cial parameters in the hyphenation algorithm and thus can waste quite some time. Is there a good way to formulate this? Surely Conflicts: is too hard? Or just erase it and hope libhnj will get fixed some day? Regards, Steve -- Steve Wolter (Univ. of Bielefeld)| Web page: http://swolter.sdf1.org | vCard: http://swolter.sdf1.org/swolter.vcf A witty saying proves nothing. | Schedule: http://swolter.sdf1.org/swolter.ifb -- Voltaire (1694-1778) | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpxRIQce9yhK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
