On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:40:01PM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote: > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 22:36 +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 12:58 -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote: > > > Your log didn't include an example for "temporarily blocked" and > > > "multirecipient email", but those were clear enough anyway. I also > > > added "please relay via your ISP", which was not covered by your patch. > > > > > > I was intrigued by your making optional of one space and all of > > > client/helo/from/to in the "weighted check" rule. Was that intentional? > > > > I'm pretty sure there was a reason for that, but it could be that it was > > a leftover from some variation of the rule. You can leave it out and > > i'll file a new bug if it's required. > > Hmm.. after re-reading that all, i was of course referring to the first > optional space. > > The client/helo/... is optional because it's not always included in the > "decided action=PREPEND" form. I faintly remember considering using 2 > sets of rules for those lines but decided against it for some reason. Are these optional due to use of delay_reject=no ?
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
