hi luca, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:48:37PM +0200, Luca Corti wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 08:20 -0400, sean finney wrote: > > aha... well, in that case i'd suggest editing/removing the cronjob on one > > of the machines. it's a conffile for exactly this reason :) > > Sure, but in that case when the service switchs to the machine without > the cronjob lgorotation is not performed, which is bad.
then why not customize instead of remove? for example, if you're
using linux-ha for clustering, you could use the output of
cl_status to determine whether or not to continue.
just an idea, anyway...
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
