On Friday 14 March 2008 7:53:06 pm Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> This message is flagged important. Such messages are not archived by
> default, this is correct behaviour and documented in the manpage.
> I acknowledge that such behaviour might be surprising, but I think so
> far nobody has complained. :-) This might explain 2) above.
Ahh! I had apparently never noticed that. --include-flagged did the trick.
I apologize for that!
> It doesn't explain problem 1), though. Can you give an example of a
> message which seems to be archived only with cutoff dates in the future?
I just tried -d 0, which yielded:
File "/usr/bin/archivemail", line 1040, in is_older_than_days
assert(max_days >= 1)
Using -d 1 does not grab any messages that I received within the last few
hours.
-- John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
