I agree, i will change the unison binary name in the next version of the
packages ( i don't have yet choose the best way to do it : symlink or
rename ).
Cool - I would just rename the binary - no need for both '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@' & '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'
* unison-gtk includes the text interface with the '-ui text' argument,
so it should conflict with unison, not depend on it
Humm, i agree it doesn't need to depend on it, but i won't use a
conflict fields. You could be able to install both of them -- because
they can be installed on the same system ( there is certain package that
really conflicts, because you cannot install them on the same system :
cdrecord with xcdroast (<< 0.98+0alpha14-5), they won't work together ).
If you think, it is not possible to install them on the same machine (
apart from the fact that this is twice the same package one with GTK ui,
one without ).
They would conflict because they would contain the same binary - /usr/bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
Rename the binary '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@-gtk' -> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@' because it provides all the functionality of '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@' & there's no need for both '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@' & '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@-gtk' - the '-ui' argument exists for choosing the text or graphic interface
Humm, i have read your patch, i cannot apply it just out of the box :
Thanks for looking it over - our changes are not for everyone : )
- i don't want to rename unison to unison-text and unison-gtk to unison-graphic
No problem - we made this choice with deference to upstream '-ui' argument values - unison-gtk may fit better with official debian pacakge names
- i don't want to include version number in the current stable unison package ( ie unison should not be unison2.10.2 for now ).
I agree - your way is cleaner
- most of your rewrite on NEWS/README seems to be only cosmetic ( but maybe i have missed something ).
Entirely cosmetic - just my obsessive-compulsiveness : )
- i have a problem with (Closes...) and ( Closes... ), i have a
discussion with a better english writer than me, who have explained me
typographic rules of english, i won't use ( Closes... ) anymore, but i
won't change older changelog entries to reflect this ( because i have
never changed former changelog entry ).
Cool - I respect that - 2.10.2 also closes #209264
Thank you for the patch and the comment, it will be included in next
unison package. I hope it will better fit your need, even if i don't apply all your patch.
Thank you for maintaining unison - it's awesome!
Jack
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
