Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:47:44PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: >> git-cherry-pick uses the user running git-cherry-pick as the author >> and committer. At a minimum, it should preserve the original author. > > Hi Josh, it does so for me > > mkdir repo && cd repo && git init > echo foo >foo && git add foo && git commit -mfoo > git checkout -b b > echo bar >bar && git add bar > GIT_AUTHOR_NAME=foo [EMAIL PROTECTED] git commit -mbar > git checkout master > echo baz >baz && git add baz && git commit -m baz > git cherry-pick b > > git show --pretty=full > > The last command prints: > --- > commit 7f954f36b7a73cc94ad4ba5a3fc4621a2449d392 > Author: foo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Commit: Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > bar > > diff --git a/bar b/bar > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..5716ca5 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/bar > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > +bar > --- > > Checked 1.5.4.1 and 1.5.4.3. Do you have a testcase?
Hmmm. I remember observing behavior that contradicted this example, with the cherry-picked commit using me as the author and committer, but I don't have a test case right now, and I can't seem to reproduce this bug anymore. I'll reopen if I recreate it. - Josh Triplett
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
