Hi,
On Mar 5, 7:26am, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, I think I've handled enough of such NMUs to know that adding
> files to debian/po is anything but invasive.
I used to maintain a couple (11 to be more precise) packages with Apache 1.3
modues. They used shared debconf tamplates, so each change had to be done in
all of them in exact same way. Obviously BTS entries ranged from 11 identical
reports through a single one reported for random package to pathological cases
of 11 different translations. And yes, there was one impatient NMU-er who got
all this screwed-up and uploaded that to 0-day wait queue.
So yes, there are situations when you can break things by just adding .po
files. And yes, they are rare and easy to spot if you know what you're doing.
> Attached is the patch I came up with as of now.
Thanks.
> My proposal indeed drops the debconf note. It is talking about a
> change that happened about 7 years ago if I'm correct reading the
Yes. I don't think it's relevant any longer.
> Alternatively, but I think it still would be a quite bad idea,
> uploading with "just" the 3 pending PO files would be nearly OK for
> me.
Actually there are 4.
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek ----------------- Coven / Svart --------------------- |
< o o > | http://www.coven.vmh.net/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GSM:
+48603240006 |
\ ^ / | GPG/PGP info in message headers * [ Debian GNU/Linux developer ] |
(") | * * Love is being stupid together. -- Valery |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
