On Wednesday 27 February 2008 14:50, Philippe Teuwen wrote: > > I think this would be very suitable to include. I have one question > > though: it's currently licenced GPLv3. There are already two different > > licences for the scripts in signing-party: GPLv2+ and BSD. To keep things > > simple I would very much prefer not to add a third one to that. So my > > question to you is: would you agree to relicence under either GPLv2+ or > > BSD? If not there's no real problem of course. > > > > No prob, by this mail I relicense it as GPLv2 or newer. > (I won't copy again the full script here...)
Thanks! I've included it now in Subversion with some added tweaks. It will be part of our next upload. Thijs
pgpuwGneR5J78.pgp
Description: PGP signature
