Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 01 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Here's a patch that I think resolves this and is more explicit about >> the problems and the suggested solutions. >> >> Comments? Seconds? > > Looks good except: > >> + This package might typically be named >> + <package><var>libraryname</var>-runtime</package>; note the >> + absence of the <var>soversion</var> in the package name. > > We have more lib.*-tools (22) than lib.*-runtime (15). I wonder if we > shouldn't rather recommend *-tools... it's probably more explicit to the > end user too. On the other hand, it might create undue expectations. > > That said: seconded whatever naming you choose. Sure, that works for me. I'll make that change. Thanks for the review! -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
