Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a patch based heavily on Joey's original patch that describes
> that. This patch (similar to Joey's) doesn't include the URL
> canonicalization requirements of the secure BROWSER specification. They
> don't seem obviously necessary to me and are complex and would add a lot
> of additional wording to explain how to canonicalize URLs.
>
> Comments? Seconds?
I have gotten no further feedback on this proposal other than Clint's note
that he finds this better-specified than the original ESR BROWSER
specification, but hesitates to comment further since he doesn't use it.
I would like to resolve this bug for the next Policy release, but I don't
want to just commit patches on my own say-so.
Could those reading the Policy list please review the patch at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=172436#154
and either second or point out problems so that we can resolve this and
close this bug?
Thanks!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
