-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Package: bisonc++
Version: 2.4.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch


Hi,

        While translating the bisonc++ package description in
DDTP, I had the impression that some wrong references are made
about bison++ and bisonc++. Below is a proposed patch, but I'm
a little bit unsure if that is the intended idea. I hope this
helps.

- ---------->8---------->8---------->8---------->8---------->8----------
- --- control.orig        2008-02-20 01:00:32.417542772 -0300
+++ control     2008-02-20 01:01:56.422329932 -0300
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@
  function. The class can easily be provided with additional members without
  needing polymorphic functions. Consequently, classes generated by bisonc++
  have no virtual members and actually have but one public member: parse(),
- - replacing the old-style bison and bisonc++ yyparse() function.
+ replacing the old-style bison and bison++ yyparse() function.
  .
  Bisonc++ offers many options, among which an option to define classes
  generated by bisonc++ in a separate namespace. This allows developers to
  define additional symbols, even outside of the class generated by bisonc++,
  without encountering name-collision problems. With bisonc++, artificial means
- - to prevent name-collisions, like bison and bisonc++'s yy-convention are not
+ to prevent name-collisions, like bison and bison++'s yy-convention are not
  required anymore when using bisonc++.  Bisonc++ merely generates C++ code. If
  C code is required, bison should be used. Bisonc++'s grammar requirements are
  highly compatible with bison's requirements, so converting a bison grammar
- ----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------

        Thanks in advance.


- --- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 testing www.debian-multimedia.org
500 testing security.debian.org
500 testing ftp.br.debian.org

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHu6aECjAO0JDlykYRAnwsAJ9i+Ggo+kx4p/fL2xds4o945f6jMwCgoE4S
+RruXKKOrmTHUNNj1PAJqz4=
=K7x5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to