I have made a change (Committed revision 524 which hopefully addresses
this. Could someone test it please?
M
Morten Werner Forsbring wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here is another bugreport from one of our Debian users.
>
> "Chun Tian (binghe)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have servers with multiple addresses on the same interface eth1:
>>
>> 2: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
>> link/ether 00:1c:c4:a9:73:74 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> inet 172.17.2.6/20 brd 172.17.15.255 scope global eth1
>> inet 192.168.0.24/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth1:0
>> inet 172.17.2.18/20 brd 172.17.15.255 scope global secondary eth1
>> inet 172.17.2.15/20 brd 172.17.15.255 scope global secondary eth1
>> inet6 fe80::21c:c4ff:fea9:7374/64 scope link
>> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>>
>> cfengine's ${global.ipv4[eth1]} returns 172.17.2.15, which is the last
>> address on eth1 (not included eth1:0). I need it return the first
>> address of eth1 (172.17.2.6), because other addresses are dynamic and
>> under control of the Linux-HA/Heartbeat.
>>
>> I think cfengine cannot handle this correctly now, could DD fix this or
>> forward it to the author?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Chun TIAN (binghe)
>
> I have similar output on servers running Linux Virtual Server [1] and
> HP ServiceGuard [2], e.g. like this for LVS:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # ip addr ls
> ...
> 12: bond1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
> link/ether 00:11:43:de:74:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet x.y.z.47/25 brd x.y.z.127 scope global bond1
> inet x.y.z.20/32 scope global bond1
> inet x.y.z.50/32 scope global bond1
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / #
>
> So this is a more or less common setup on Linux
> cluster-solutions. I've tried a bit with cfengine 2.2.3, and it's the
> last IP listed by 'ip addr ls' that cfengine store in the
> global.ipv4[ethX]-variable:
>
> sue:~# ip addr ls
> ...
> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:13:ce:a4:e3:e4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 192.168.0.101/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth1
> inet 192.168.0.199/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global secondary
> eth1
> inet6 fe80::213:ceff:fea4:e3e4/64 scope link
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> sue:~# cfagent -d3 | grep ipv4
> ...
> 590 : ipv4_2[eth1]=192.168
> 1895 : ipv4[eth1]=192.168.0.199
> 2100 : ipv4_1[eth1]=192
> 4049 : ipv4_3[eth1]=192.168.0
> sue:~#
>
> I agree with Chun Tian that the first IP-address listed by
> 'ip addr ls' should be the one picked up for global.ipvx[ethX], at
> least with these kinds of Linux cluster-solutions in mind. What do you
> think?
>
> Marry christmas! :)
>
>
> - Werner
>
> [1] http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
> [2] http://h20219.www2.hp.com/enterprise/cache/6468-0-0-0-121.html
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-cfengine mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
--
Mark Burgess
Web: http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
Tlf: +47 22453272
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
