Hi, Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2008, 16:54 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > Package: xaralx > Version: 0.7r1692-2 > Severity: important > > Heya, > > Building xaralx on my mipsel buildd failed: > > | Automatic build of xaralx_0.7r1692-2 on modi by sbuild/mipsel 98-farm > | Build started at 20080217-1343 > | > ****************************************************************************** > [...] > | Checking correctness of source dependencies... > | Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.7-6 gcc-4.2_4.2.3-1 g++-4.2_4.2.3-1 > binutils_2.18.1~cvs20080103-1 libstdc++6-4.2-dev_4.2.3-1 > libstdc++6_4.3-20080202-1 > [...] > | checking CDraw location... configure: error: Architecture > mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu not supported > | make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 > | dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 > | > ****************************************************************************** > | Build finished at 20080217-1405 > | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] > | Build needed 00:05:07, 93380k disk space > > A complete build log can be found at > http://experimental.debian.net/build.php?arch=mipsel&pkg=xaralx&ver=0.7r1692-2 > > If the package is simply not portable, not setting Arch: any might be a > good idea.
You are right. Should I do an upload to fix this, or would it be enough to fix this in the next regular upload? (Although I’m not sure whether that will happen at all, upstreams quite dead, it seems). Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
