On Wednesday 13 February 2008, you wrote: > [Frans Pop] > > I still think this should be fixed before insserv can be considered > > usable for "normal" users. I ended up with ~200 lines before it > > finished. IMO with such numbers anybody can be forgiven for thinking > > that the script are looping. > > The slow insserv is fixed (from ~20 to <1 second per invocation), and
That's good. > the messages about scripts missing headers are best fixed by adding > headers to the scripts missing them. I agree that both these need to > be fixed before users will avoid believing that insserv is looping. In principle I agree, but OTOH I think you can never fully exclude that some scripts will not have correct headers, so trying to prevent the endless repetition of the same messages should be worthwhile anyway. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
