On Feb 11, 2008 10:45 AM, Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:43:41AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2008 7:04 AM, Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Ondrej, > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:33:28AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > > > > At the moment pyglet is included in the python-sympy package. As it > > > > > can > > > > > be viewed as a pygame replacement sympy maintainers agree that it > > > > > should > > > > > be packaged separately. > > > > > > > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459716 > > > > > > > > > > The final package will be maintained by the pkg-exppsy project on > > > > > alioth. > > > > > > > > Could you please maintain pyglet in the Debian Python Modules Team > > > > (DPMT)? > > > > > > > > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam > > > > > > > > This is so that it's easy for the DPMT members to manage and make > > > > changes to all python modules. For example when a python policy > > > > changes, > > > > or we switch from python2.4 to python2.5 etc. > > > Sure I would, but read on. > > > > > > > Upstream has released a new version that works with sympy. Any > > > > progress in packaging it? > > > I have a package for 1.0. But I failed to convince upstream the put the > > > documentation sources into the source tarball. He seems to be pretty > > > much set with respect to what people need and what not. Therefore the > > > sources have to be repackages (removed docs) or a new source > > > distribution has to be compiled from the upstream source SVN. > > > > I see. No problem, let's repackage upstream by deleting the doc > > directory I do that > > by adding a target get-orig-sources in the debian/rules, which does that > > for me. > Right. It is just not nice that the package won't ship docs. But well, > that's life.
Well, I prefer to browse the docs on the web anyway, or read the sources directly. > > > > At the moment I am (re)evaluating whether I want to do that or go with > > > pygame. > > > > In sympy, we use svn, but for Debian I recommend to package the latest > > released > > version (with deleting the doc dir), so that all is clear which version we > > have. > > > > > > > > If you or the DPMT want to take over, please feel free to do so: > > > > > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-exppsy/pyglet.git;a=summary > > > > OK, I'll take over it. The only problem is that DPMT uses svn for all > > it's packages. > > So I just start initialize it with your latest git version, is that ok? > Sure, please go on. > > Could you please drop me a note when you checked it into SVN. I will > remove the git repository when it is done. I am sorry for a stupid question - am I doing something wrong, or is the git repository corrupted? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/p$ git clone git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-exppsy/pyglet.git Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/p/pyglet/.git/ remote: Generating pack... remote: Done counting 1440 objects. remote: Deltifying 1440 objects... remote: 100% (1440/1440) done remote: Total 1440 (delta 945), reused 1315 (delta 828) Receiving objects: 100% (1440/1440), 4.10 MiB | 391 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (945/945), done. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/p$ cd pyglet/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/p/pyglet$ ls [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/p/pyglet$ la .git [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/p/pyglet$ git branch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/p/pyglet$ git log fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/p/pyglet$ I am not seeing any files, and "git log" fails, so does gitk. Could you please send me the debian dir, maybe it will be easier. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
