Hi,
thanks for your QA effort.
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
use of a bashism.
checkbashisms' output:
possible bashism in ./usr/bin/wnb line 112 (should be '.', not 'source'):
source $configfile
Are your sure that this is no false positive. IMHO the line you
pointed to is pure TCL/TK code. I personally have no knowledge in
TCL/TK and its syntax. It might be that the line you are mentioning
is a system command that should be interpreted by /bin/sh but the
fact that the first line of /usr/bin/wnb says it is a shell script
just is a wrapper around wish.
Not using bash as /bin/sh would lead to errors or unexpected behaviours.
Have you actually observed such unexpected behaviour with wnb or are
you just guessing. I can not commit this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]