On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:14:49PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > I'll see what I can do about injecting it in. > > Isn't it on some public mailing list archive?
The -bugs lists don't appear to have archives. > > Basically, don't hold your breath. > > > I'm not over the moon about the Ubuntu patch, but I guess if push > > What's 'wrong' with it? As I've said previously, I'd rather not make the downstream DHCP package deviate significantly in behaviour from the upstream software. I don't particularly like having magical strings that are interpretted differently to literal strings. I'd rather see it be a directive than a magical string that gets special treatment. According to upstream, their config parser can't cope with that concept though. > And what are other distributions doing? Not sure, I haven't looked. Why don't you and let me know? I suggest you lobby upstream to implement the functionality, as I have been. http://marc.info/?l=dhcp-users&m=120027890132057&w=4 regards Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
