On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:56:47PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Riku Voipio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Package: samba > > Version: 3.0.28-2 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: patch > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Usertags: eabi
> > While scanning for arm-specific settings which omit armel, it > > was noticed samba does not pull in libacl-dev for armel. The > Indeed. I see no reason for us to not Build-Depends on libacl-dev for > armel as well. > Steve, objections? The architecture list here is assembled using type-handling's list of known Linux architectures, and will be overwritten using the package's 'update-archs' target. If armel is not in that list, that's a bug that should be fixed in type-handling; if it is in that list, this bug should be fixed by running a 'debian/rules update-archs' and committing the result. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
