Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I think that the section about "Who can do an NMU" should be removed. > There's no point in keeping it. Why wouldn't non-DD be allowed to > prepare NMU, and then find a sponsor?
Because every regression that resulted from the NMU should be dealt with as soon as possible to cause as little disturbance to the maintainer as possible. Waiting for sponsors in this case is not acceptable IMHO. Thats why a DD who sponsors an NMU will in most cases be treated as the sole responsible of the upload. So instead of sponsoring the upload it would be much clearer if the DD just mentions the work done by the non-DD in the changelog. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
