On May 07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oh well, what are all thos other entries in links.conf for then ? They needed are by drivers which are not hardware-related and cannot be autoprobed or easily autoloaded.
> I don't think it is against the kernel. But seriouly, why not have the > workaround in place, it is just a couple of lines, compared to the bigger and > more destabilizing changes that this would represent for the kernel. Don know Because a) it's the wrong workaround for multiple reasons and b) then I would have to maintain it potentially forever. > init scripts ? You mean that lib1394 should add its own /etc/init.d script ? Yes. > why not just have it cat the lines to the udev files ? Because it's not the right place. > > No, but I encourage Debian users to switch to it. > By making sure that debian is less functional than ubuntu ? No, by explaining that for many uses it is a more useful distribution than debian/stable. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
