Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm also wondering whether it would be nice to catch missing local
> “pristine-tar” local branch.
> 
> Currently, if git-branch is omitted above, one ends up getting:
> | $ pristine-tar checkout ../graphviz_2.16.orig.tar.gz
> | fatal: ambiguous argument 'pristine-tar:graphviz_2.16.orig.tar.gz.delta': 
> unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
> | Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
> | pristine-tar: git show pristine-tar:graphviz_2.16.orig.tar.gz.delta failed
> 
> I've pushed an “explicit-errors” branch[1] with a tiny patch to improve
> this a bit:

Applied, except I don't like pristine-tar prompting, I think it should
be something that can be run noninteractively. So I removed that part
and made it just use the remote branch if there was exactly one.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to